On 2/28/19 10:21 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/28/19 7:38 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> in Solaris 10 apparently O_CLOEXEC is not defined.
>> (got a bug report in http://gnats.netbsd.org/54025)
>>
>> Attached is a patch wrapping the code using it in #ifdef O_CLOEXEC.
>
> Incomplete -
On 2/28/19 7:38 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> in Solaris 10 apparently O_CLOEXEC is not defined.
> (got a bug report in http://gnats.netbsd.org/54025)
>
> Attached is a patch wrapping the code using it in #ifdef O_CLOEXEC.
Incomplete - if you are unable to atomically set the CLOEXEC f
On 2/28/19 8:38 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> in Solaris 10 apparently O_CLOEXEC is not defined.
> (got a bug report in http://gnats.netbsd.org/54025)
>
> Attached is a patch wrapping the code using it in #ifdef O_CLOEXEC.
Thanks for the report. This was fixed in the devel branch a fe
Hi folks,
in Solaris 10 apparently O_CLOEXEC is not defined.
(got a bug report in http://gnats.netbsd.org/54025)
Attached is a patch wrapping the code using it in #ifdef O_CLOEXEC.
thanks.
>From e9d262e43c6d4ada77f1b722f352fb55a4107ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maya Rashish
Date: Thu, 28 F