completion also
showed me the completed filenames. It's a little bit nonstraightforward, but
it solved the problem. Does anybody know of an easier way to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bash-command-completion-when-not-connected-to-a-t
trolled in
bash? Is this just a difference between bash 3.00.16 and 3.2 (or maybe a
difference between Windows bash and Solaris bash?), or do the two shells
just happen to use slightly different default settings? Is there a way to
configure bash to echo back each character that was sent to it's stdin?
-
raner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The completion seems to work, but I do not receive the completed filename
> from the shell's stdout.
It's written to stderr, not stdout.
paul
___
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
s
connected to a terminal? Or am I misunderstanding how the completion is
supposed to work, and part of the work is actually done by the terminal and
not by the shell?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Mirko
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bash-command-completion-wh