Re: [RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-12-24 Thread Raphaël Droz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Raphaël Droz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > > On 5/30/11 2:05 PM, Raphaël Droz wrote: > > > === Rationale: > > > Let's say you want to complete http URL (which contain ':'). > > > > > > The completion probably contai

Re: [RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-08-22 Thread Raphaël Droz
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 5/30/11 2:05 PM, Raphaël Droz wrote: > > === Rationale: > > Let's say you want to complete http URL (which contain ':'). > > > > The completion probably contains this kind of statement: > > > > _comp() { > > COMPREPLY=( $(compge

Re: [RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-06-24 Thread Raphaël
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 5/30/11 2:05 PM, Raphaël Droz wrote: > > It seems like if gnu.bash@googlegroups.com eat the first occurrence > > of this email (not in the mailman archives)... second attempt: > > > > === Rationale: > > Let's say you want to comp

Re: [RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-06-23 Thread Chet Ramey
On 5/30/11 2:05 PM, Raphaël Droz wrote: > It seems like if gnu.bash@googlegroups.com eat the first occurrence > of this email (not in the mailman archives)... second attempt: > > === Rationale: > Let's say you want to complete http URL (which contain ':'). > > The completion probably contains

Re: [RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-06-09 Thread Chet Ramey
On 5/30/11 2:05 PM, Raphaël Droz wrote: > It seems like if gnu.bash@googlegroups.com eat the first occurrence > of this email (not in the mailman archives)... second attempt: I haven't looked closely at the proposed patches, but there are certain things about the reasoning I find puzzling. >

[RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-05-30 Thread Raphaël Droz
It seems like if gnu.bash@googlegroups.com eat the first occurrence of this email (not in the mailman archives)... second attempt: === Rationale: Let's say you want to complete http URL (which contain ':'). The completion probably contains this kind of statement: _comp() { COMPREPLY=