I need to correct a point in my own explanation. No revision to the
patch itself is necessary.
At 2024-12-16T11:48:15-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Since AT&T troff also lacks a feature for hyphenless discretionary
> breaks (groff's `\%`),
I of course meant `\:` here. If you knew your man
Unfortunately, the *roff `ad` request doesn't work like everyone seems
to think it does. When invoked without an argument, it does not mean
"restore whatever the previous adjustment mode was before I invoked `na`
to turn off adjustment". Instead, it means "make sure lines are
adjusted regardless
