Re: [PATCH] tests/unicode1.sub: fixup

2023-11-24 Thread Grisha Levit
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023, 17:32 Chet Ramey wrote: > Thanks for the report. Nice attention to detail. This test has not changed > substantially since it was donated in 2012. Namerefs didn't exist then, and > my guess is that John Kearney wasn't familiar or comfortable with ${!x[@]}. > > https://lists.

Re: [PATCH] tests/unicode1.sub: fixup

2023-11-24 Thread Chet Ramey
On 11/22/23 7:46 PM, Grisha Levit wrote: Many of the tests in unicode.sub don't actually run because the arrays containing codepoints to test are sparse and the TestCodePage function assumes that they are not. Thanks for the report. Nice attention to detail. This test has not changed substantia

[PATCH] tests/unicode1.sub: fixup

2023-11-22 Thread Grisha Levit
Many of the tests in unicode.sub don't actually run because the arrays containing codepoints to test are sparse and the TestCodePage function assumes that they are not. If that's fixed, the zh_TW.BIG5 tests run but fail. I'm not sure what the original intent was, they seem to expect U+00F6..U+00FE