On 6/19/18 10:27 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 15:18 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 6/12/18 3:15 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>
>>> In case it can be somewhat useful, once 5.0-beta with the new
>>> option is
>>> out I'll ask QA at $work to run regressions tests on it and report
>>>
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 15:18 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/12/18 3:15 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > In case it can be somewhat useful, once 5.0-beta with the new
> > option is
> > out I'll ask QA at $work to run regressions tests on it and report
> > back
> > in case any issues are found. They h
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 14:54 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/12/18 1:28 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 11:03 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > > On 6/8/18 10:40 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any chance you had a sec to look at the diff? Would love some
> > > > feedback!
> >
On 6/12/18 3:15 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> In case it can be somewhat useful, once 5.0-beta with the new option is
> out I'll ask QA at $work to run regressions tests on it and report back
> in case any issues are found. They have a lot of tests for the command
> line interface (not just related t
On 6/12/18 1:28 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 11:03 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 6/8/18 10:40 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>
>>> Any chance you had a sec to look at the diff? Would love some
>>> feedback!
>>
>> I'm going to try and look at it this weekend. It's been a busy couple
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 11:03 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/8/18 10:40 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > Any chance you had a sec to look at the diff? Would love some
> > feedback!
>
> I'm going to try and look at it this weekend. It's been a busy couple
> of
> months.
Hi Chet,
I've seen that the
On 6/8/18 10:40 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Any chance you had a sec to look at the diff? Would love some feedback!
I'm going to try and look at it this weekend. It's been a busy couple of
months.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita b
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 14:40 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 15:44 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 14:40 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > > On 5/25/18 1:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > > There is already logic that determines whether the shell is
> >
On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 15:44 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 14:40 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > On 5/25/18 1:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >
> > > > There is already logic that determines whether the shell is
> > > > trying to
> > > > complete a command word (in_command_position
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 14:40 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/25/18 1:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > > There is already logic that determines whether the shell is
> > > trying to
> > > complete a command word (in_command_position). The existing code
> > > does
> > > not attempt programmable compl
On 5/25/18 1:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>> There is already logic that determines whether the shell is trying to
>> complete a command word (in_command_position). The existing code does
>> not attempt programmable completion if in_command_position == 1. The
>> additional functionality would:
>>
>
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 09:53 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/23/18 9:34 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 09:15 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > > On 5/23/18 5:44 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > So by that, do you mean that it's possible to stop
> > > > autocompleting
> > > > to
On 5/23/18 9:34 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 09:15 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 5/23/18 5:44 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>
>>> So by that, do you mean that it's possible to stop autocompleting
>>> to
>>> files/dirs/binaries just using a programmable completion script? Or
>>> did
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 09:15 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/23/18 5:44 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > So by that, do you mean that it's possible to stop autocompleting
> > to
> > files/dirs/binaries just using a programmable completion script? Or
> > did
> > I misunderstand? Apologies if that's th
On 5/23/18 5:44 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> So by that, do you mean that it's possible to stop autocompleting to
> files/dirs/binaries just using a programmable completion script? Or did
> I misunderstand? Apologies if that's the case.
>
> Right now we do have completion scripts to implement the h
On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 15:34 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/18/18 7:06 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Network operating systems traditionally have provided a command
> > line interface with "operation mode" and "configuration mode", with
> > different auto-completion behaviour - specifically, with a
On 5/18/18 7:06 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Network operating systems traditionally have provided a command
> line interface with "operation mode" and "configuration mode", with
> different auto-completion behaviour - specifically, with a small set
> of supported commands that are printed using the
Network operating systems traditionally have provided a command
line interface with "operation mode" and "configuration mode", with
different auto-completion behaviour - specifically, with a small set
of supported commands that are printed using the auto-completion
shortcut key, depending on the mo
18 matches
Mail list logo
