also sprach Chet Ramey [2009.07.03.1952 +0200]:
> There is, in fact a de facto standard, but the bash4 behavior is
> what the Bourne and Korn shells have always done. In fact, the only
> way Martin's statement is true is if "all other shells" means "dash",
> since that's the only other shell I fo
Matthias Klose wrote:
> wouldn't this changed behaviour warrent a compatibility switch?
I'm going to do what the Posix group decides. Read
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2009-06/msg00107.html
for a summary; portions of which I will reproduce below. (And the
line that got munged in
wouldn't this changed behaviour warrent a compatibility switch?
--- Begin Message ---
# justification: breaks plenty other packages,
# and if only by way of #522255
severity 518752 grave
tags 518752 upstream confirmed
thanks
also sprach Andreas Metzler [2009.03.08.1442
+0100]:
> d. Fixed a bug
