Re: printf %m$ and %*m$ unimplemented in Bash, but implementated in C compilers

2024-05-29 Thread porterleete
he documentation, then. On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 8:23 PM Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2024, at 8:58 PM, porterleete wrote: > > The man page for printf says that for integer m, %m$ lets you > > specify which argument that the conversion specification will use. >

Re: printf %m$ and %*m$ unimplemented in Bash, but implementated in C compilers

2024-05-29 Thread porterleete
>I guess it could be more explicit Yes, that is essentially what I was asking for. There are several standards for printf, and it was ambiguous which one was being referred to. There's the C standards, the POSIX standards, and the Single Unix Specifications. I didn't know which one was being refer

printf %m$ and %*m$ unimplemented in Bash, but implementated in C compilers

2024-05-27 Thread porterleete
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: x86_64 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -g -O2 uname output: Linux portercomp3 6.9.1 #1-NixOS SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri May 17 10:18:09 UTC 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux Machine Type: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Bash Version