On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:56:49PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Yes, this is the intended behavior.
Thanks for clarifying.
> This is one of the things that
> came out of the discussions among the Posix working group. It also
> matches historical practice.
I searched the archives and found thi
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> Tobias Poschwatta a écrit :
> > In the following test case test1.sh, bash 4 behaves differently from
> > bash 3.1. The behaviour of bash 3.1 is what I would expect to be
> > correct. Is this a bug in bash 4 or
In the following test case test1.sh, bash 4 behaves differently from
bash 3.1. The behaviour of bash 3.1 is what I would expect to be
correct. Is this a bug in bash 4 or an intentional change?
Using bash 4:
$ /bin/bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.0.28(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright