Re: why are \d and \D not implemented but don't throw errors in regex?

2013-12-07 Thread Peter Cordes
actually be good if the default behaviour of glibc was to report a regex compilation error in that case, or maybe even better, print a warning like "\d: unknown special character, treating as literal". Of course, POSIX doesn't specify either \s or \d, just the [:space:] and [:digi

Re: job-control warning message that maybe shouldn't be printed

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:40:34PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 11/28/13, 7:23 AM, Peter Cordes wrote: > > I submitted this on savannah a couple days ago: > > https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?108450 > > > > As I said there, the warning message for bash re-using a

job-control warning message that maybe shouldn't be printed

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Cordes
something weird that wasn't my fault. Oh, also, the online bug-bash archive has a bad habbit of replacing code with address@hidden. There was a whole thread about setting PS1=whatever that is now a complete mystery to non-subscribers! -- #define X(x,y) x##y Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter

savannah.gnu.org bug tracker unused?

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Cordes
e only odd thing I found while playing around with this is that printf %c only prints the first byte of the UTF-8 representation of a multi-byte character. (POSIX says to be "extremely cautious" about using %c with wide characters, apparently for good reason.) -- #define X(x,y) x##y Pete