Warning (HTML included to show prog shipped w/syntax highlighting).

2011-08-10 Thread Linda W
When I have the construct, in 4.1: 1 #!/bin/bash 2 30 31 # trace control for subs 32 declare -ix Allow_Trace=$((( 33 _D_LowLevel | 34 _D_Provides | 35 _D_ 36 ))) 37 38 declare -ix Trace_off

Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools...

2006-04-05 Thread Linda W
Chet Ramey wrote: The remaining consideration is whether or not there's a significant body of scripts out there that rely on the current behavior. If there isn't, I would strongly consider the change to require a leading `0' in octal constants. I don't think that \x introducing hex constants is

Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools...

2006-03-27 Thread Linda W
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Note: As far as I can tell the echo tests in the configure script generated by autoconf-2.59 tests for quite many things but not \digit as far as I can tell. I have not yet looked into the CVS version. Regards Henrik --- Sorry, haven't been involved too much on t

Re: [squid-users] Re: my "CPPUNIT" is "broken"... ;-) ?

2006-03-23 Thread Linda W
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: fre 2006-03-17 klockan 19:31 -0800 skrev Linda W: Mystery solved. My shell _expanded_ control sequences by default in echo. (echo "\1" -> becomes "echo ^A"). Apparently there are literals in the configure script like "\\1" "\\2&q

Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools...

2006-03-23 Thread Linda W
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: lör 2006-03-18 klockan 14:15 -0800 skrev Linda W: Bash added the "feature" to allow dropping of the leading "0", accepting strings: "\0nnn", "\nnn", and "\xHH". I'm guessing that most bash users run in a