Le 27. 09. 14 07:53, Eric Blake a écrit :
[...]
So, to FULLY test whether you are still vulnerable to ShellShock, we
must come up with a test that proves that NO possible function body
assigned to a valid shell variable name can EVER cause bash to invoke
the parser without your consent. For tha
Le 26. 09. 14 18:55, Steve Simmons a écrit :
These patches build and run without problem in our initial bash2 tests. However, I notice
that both the version number reported by ./bash --version and doing ./bash followed by
echo $BASH_VERSION both report "2.05b.0(1)-release". All versions that I'
Le 26. 09. 14 16:47, Chet Ramey a écrit :
On 9/26/14, 4:53 AM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Hello,
While this can seem completely obsolete, I still have machines running bash
2.05b (Debian etch). I worry about upgrading to bash 3.x because of some
backward compatibility issue.
It there any
Hello,
While this can seem completely obsolete, I still have machines running
bash 2.05b (Debian etch). I worry about upgrading to bash 3.x because of
some backward compatibility issue.
It there any reason why there was no patch for bash 2.05b ? The test
command below show that the bug also af
