On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> Dmitry, your t.c in the debian report gives:
>
> On Solaris 8:
[...]
> On HPUX 11.11:
[...]
>
> So they don't seem to care either to retry and send the data
> if the first write() fails.
Yes, it seems they purge all data in the
Hello Stephane,
I was wrong about suggestion freopen("/dev/stdout") in my previous mail.
It cannot be used to redirect stdout.
Regards,
Dmitry
Hi Stephane,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:08:33AM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> thanks for replying, I gave a list in another email. I tried on
> Solaris 7 and HPUX and both seem to flush the buffer upon an
> unsuccessful fflush()
I see... I wonder how they work in regard of my original problem
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:05:57AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I wouldn't be surprised if it has to do with the fix to debian
> > bug #429021. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429021
> > (I'm CCing Dmitry who is the author of that change according to
> > bugs.debian.org)
> >
>
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:18:07PM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> Now, I'm not sure if we can say that the new glibc behavior
> observed is bogus (other than it's different from the behavior
> observed in all the libcs I tried with).
What libc have you tried?
To me, the new behavior makes much
