On 7/15/25 1:26 PM, Zachary Santer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:39 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
On 7/15/25 11:35 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:29 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
With respect to not consulting the list of saved pids if given a list
of pid arguments, solving this pr
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:39 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 7/15/25 11:35 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:29 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
> >>
> >> With respect to not consulting the list of saved pids if given a list
> >> of pid arguments, solving this problem.
> >
> > I'd like to
My bad, I did'nt upgraded my source tree!
Sorry for the noise!
Le Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 09:58:56AM -0400, Chet Ramey a écrit :
> On 7/15/25 7:33 AM, Félix Hauri wrote:
>
> >var=99;humanizeVar var;echo $var
> >90.95T
> > looks good, but
> >var=99;humanizeVarFact
On 7/15/25 3:21 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:22:35 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID: <90a41c5d-c407-4a36-b7b1-21a9201b4...@case.edu>
| Say you have something like
|
| if command; then
|declare -i X
|X=some-random-expressio
On 7/15/25 11:35 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:29 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
With respect to not consulting the list of saved pids if given a list
of pid arguments, solving this problem.
I'd like to think that's just a stopgap, but yeah, I can play around with that.
Why do
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:29 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> With respect to not consulting the list of saved pids if given a list
> of pid arguments, solving this problem.
I'd like to think that's just a stopgap, but yeah, I can play around with that.
Date:Tue, 15 Jul 2025 23:17:56 +1000
From:Martin D Kealey
Message-ID:
| For stat to give an accurate answer, a snapshot of the content would have
| to be generated, counted, and discarded,
Not at all - simply define the format in such a way that the size is
eit
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: aarch64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -march=armv8-a -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -fexceptions
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
-fstack-clash-protection
-DDEFAULT_PATH_VAL
On 7/15/25 10:27 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 9:46 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
Why not just try the patch I attached to the message?
Because I'd rather the new POSIX-mode 'wait -n' behavior work
correctly? You said the patch reverted the behavior to that of bash
5.2.
With res
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 9:46 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> Why not just try the patch I attached to the message?
Because I'd rather the new POSIX-mode 'wait -n' behavior work
correctly? You said the patch reverted the behavior to that of bash
5.2.
On 7/14/25 7:00 PM, jason stein wrote:
Hi Chet,
thanks for the suggestion. I will update the code when I get a chance to
make dh a loadable builtin.
There are templates in examples/loadables that will get you started.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
On 7/15/25 7:33 AM, Félix Hauri wrote:
var=99;humanizeVar var;echo $var
90.95T
looks good, but
var=99;humanizeVarFactor=1000 humanizeVar var;echo $var
99.00T
should sow '100.00T' instead!
That's what I get on macOS.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long
On 7/15/25 8:22 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:52 AM Zachary Santer wrote:
Alright, that's definitely what's going on.
Actually, no. I am having a heck of a time trying to duplicate this
behavior any other way. See attached. This is the current tip of the
devel branch, 8
On 7/15/25 6:52 AM, Zachary Santer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:52 PM John Sidles wrote:
I was a pretty big part of that discussion, and this looks broken to
me. If 'wait -n' is passed a list of pids, it shouldn't also be
waiting for other background processes that weren't passed to it as
On 7/14/25 10:52 PM, John Sidles wrote:
Prior to bash 5.3, this functionality was provided (even in posix mode) by
'wait -n "${PIDS[@]}";'' ... this bash idiom worked GREAT.
Now, in bash 5.3, this 'wait -n' functionality still works fine ... EXCEPT
in posix-mode. Huh?
I sent a patch to fi
On 7/14/25 1:32 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:34:12 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID: <6a02a36f-d31d-4816-8988-5a4ccf960...@case.edu>
| The short story is that `wait -n' now returns the status of any process
| that's completed and hasn't b
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, 03:46 Robert Elz, wrote:
> | > This happens because /sys/block/*/uevent show up as regular files,
> and
> | > reports a file size of 4096 in stat:
> | Which isn't the true file size.
>
> And I'd be reporting that as a kernel bug.
But linux seems to be filled with crap
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 8:22 AM Zachary Santer wrote:
>
> I am having a heck of a time trying to duplicate this
> behavior any other way.
I'm betting this is some kind of bash-internal race condition. Does
seem specific to procsub pids in interactive mode, though.
zsant@Zack2021HPPavilion MSYS ~/
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:52 AM Zachary Santer wrote:
>
> Alright, that's definitely what's going on.
Actually, no. I am having a heck of a time trying to duplicate this
behavior any other way. See attached. This is the current tip of the
devel branch, 80a8f650a1.
It has to be commands executed
Le Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 09:40:16AM -0400, Chet Ramey a écrit :
> On 7/8/25 8:32 PM, Isabella Bosia wrote:
> > bash: fltexpr: 1e1: number out of range (error token is "1e1")
>
> What do you propose? Catch HUGE_VAL/ERANGE and convert to Inf?
Far before HUGE numbers, speaking about TERA, the
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 06:52:14 -0400, Zachary Santer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:52 PM John Sidles wrote:
> >>
> >> I was a pretty big part of that discussion, and this looks broken to
> >> me. If 'wait -n' is passed a list of pids, it shouldn't also be
> >> waiting for other background
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:52 PM John Sidles wrote:
>>
>> I was a pretty big part of that discussion, and this looks broken to
>> me. If 'wait -n' is passed a list of pids, it shouldn't also be
>> waiting for other background processes that weren't passed to it as
>> arguments. Is that what you're
Date:Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:22:35 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID: <90a41c5d-c407-4a36-b7b1-21a9201b4...@case.edu>
| Say you have something like
|
| if command; then
| declare -i X
| X=some-random-expression
| fi
|
| How does the parser determine
23 matches
Mail list logo
