on that other side it would say . not found, which it never did, so no
'' vs hard var def
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 01:10 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> can it be that i must eval it and it used to work by luck, or something ?
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 01:04 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
>
>> it doesnt
can it be that i must eval it and it used to work by luck, or something ?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 01:04 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> it doesnt stop by itself..
> so i wanted to ask the c and gdb et la folks for help
>
> interactive sources its rc on twice or more says on
> $xblpp <( .. )
> in set
it doesnt stop by itself..
so i wanted to ask the c and gdb et la folks for help
interactive sources its rc on twice or more says on
$xblpp <( .. )
in set -x
'' /dev/fd/63
for: command not found
1. i dont have "$xblpp" <( .. ) i have $xblpp <( .. )
2. on first run, also as it uses to work for sou
On Nov 01 2021, Oğuz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 1:33 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
>> Temporarily using a default value of PATH is akin to modifying it.
>
> But they are not the same thing, and you know this. The standard is
> neither on your side nor mine.
I think it can be considered a bug eith
Date:Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:35:09 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID: <3f617355-cbd2-1e62-358e-dbf9487ce...@case.edu>
| The OP assumes that the value of this functionality is self-evident. I'm
| a little more skeptical. How does it help make things easier for users?
I
imho a part of the discussion will involve the topic of then removing the
~/ files for only ~/xdg/conf whatever which i think is a nogo
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021, 15:35 Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 11/2/21 9:53 AM, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 11:48 AM Allison Karlitskaya <
> > allis
On 11/2/21 9:53 AM, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 11:48 AM Allison Karlitskaya <
> allison.karlitsk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> Please consider these two patches for inclusion in bash to support
>> storing shell initialisation files (profile, bashrc) in a subdirect
i checked the file with bvi, i dont see anything
2a 20 20 63 61
nothing, its a bash bug somewhere no ? none tried ?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021, 11:33 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> xble='declare -p xblpp' . xbl
>
> bash: : command not found
> declare -- xblpp="."
>
> this means the $xblpp is at end set
xble='declare -p xblpp' . xbl
bash: : command not found
declare -- xblpp="."
this means the $xblpp is at end set to the right, as set on the beginning
but it still says and set -x es '' <( ., ) instead of . or cat <( .. )
anyone any idea ?
see chet such ( masswise ) i meant with unreported hogg
