On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:26 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> POSIX is also silent on this.
I think ``Once a utility has been searched for and found [...], an
implementation may remember its location and need not search for the
utility again unless the PATH variable has been the subject of an
assignmen
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-musl
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -g -O2 -Wno-parentheses -Wno-format-security
uname output: Linux e4cb51356521 5.11.0-38-generic #42~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue
Sep 28 20:41:07 UTC 2021 x86_64 Linux
Mac
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 08:36:49PM +0300, Oğuz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:07 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 05:23:03PM +0200, Oğuz wrote:
> > > 31 Ekim 2021 Pazar tarihinde Mike Jonkmans yazdı:
> > > >
> > > > Using the hash as alias for commands, that are not in
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:07 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 05:23:03PM +0200, Oğuz wrote:
> > 31 Ekim 2021 Pazar tarihinde Mike Jonkmans yazdı:
> > >
> > > Using the hash as alias for commands, that are not in your PATH,
> > > seems risky though.
> >
> > Why? Risky how?
>
> R
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 05:23:03PM +0200, Oğuz wrote:
> 31 Ekim 2021 Pazar tarihinde Mike Jonkmans yazdı:
> >
> > Using the hash as alias for commands, that are not in your PATH,
> > seems risky though.
>
> Why? Risky how?
Risky, mostly on a cognitive level.
'command -p foo' doesn't look like i
Thanks for the reply. Though POSIX may allow this, still the last
line of the following example is rather unexpected behavior
$
$ echo echo MY LOCAL tmp/date SCRIPT > tmp/date
$ chmod +x tmp/date
$
$ PATH=.:/bin
$ date
Sun 31 Oct 2021 11:59:07 AM EDT
$ hash -l
builtin hash -p /bin/date date
$ cd
31 Ekim 2021 Pazar tarihinde Mike Jonkmans yazdı:
>
> Using the hash as alias for commands, that are not in your PATH,
> seems risky though.
Why? Risky how?
--
Oğuz
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 03:33:07PM +0300, Oğuz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 2:15 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> > PATH=/dev/null
> > command -p hostname
> > hostname # executes /bin/hostname via the hash table
> >
> > I agree with OP that the behaviour is a bug, or at least
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 09:05:22AM +0100, felix wrote:
> Unfortunely, this won't be useable with associative array, like:
>
>declare -A AssocVar='([Some string.]=foo)'
>test -v AssocVar['Some string.'] && echo yes || echo no
>yes
>isvar AssocVar['Some string.'] && echo yes || echo
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 2:15 PM Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> PATH=/dev/null
> command -p hostname
> hostname # executes /bin/hostname via the hash table
>
> I agree with OP that the behaviour is a bug, or at least unwanted behaviour.
I'd say it's a feature, and a good one too. N
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 01:53:55PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 10/29/21 6:06 PM, Roger Morris wrote:
>
> > Bash Version: 5.0
> > Patch Level: 17
> > Release Status: release
> >
> > Description:
> > I believe there's a bug in bash 4.4 (and still in 5.1) that wasn't
> > there in 4.3.30
> >
> > W
Unfortunely, this won't be useable with associative array, like:
declare -A AssocVar='([Some string.]=foo)'
test -v AssocVar['Some string.'] && echo yes || echo no
yes
isvar AssocVar['Some string.'] && echo yes || echo no
no
But Lea's solution seem work:
test "${AssocVar['Some
12 matches
Mail list logo