On 5/4/21 10:06 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
Let's take a step back. I think we can make the code simpler and still
handle all the cases we need to. I don't think tape devices are worth
worrying about.
The issue with the BSDs and terminal devices is that the current code
only checks for -1/ESPIPE,
On 5/4/21 4:05 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Tue, 4 May 2021 09:28:04 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID:
| The issue with the BSDs and terminal devices is that the current code
| only checks for -1/ESPIPE, but they return a different value for errno
| (EINV
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.1
Patch-ID: bash51-007
Bug-Reported-by:Tom Tromey
Bug-Reference-ID: <875z3u9fd0@tromey.com>
Bug-Reference-URL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-read
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.1
Patch-ID: bash51-008
Bug-Reported-by:Michael Felt
Bug-Reference-ID:
Bug-Reference-URL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2021-03/msg00028.html
B
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.1
Patch-ID: bash51-006
Bug-Reported-by:oguzismailuy...@gmail.com
Bug-Reference-ID:
Bug-Reference-URL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2020-12/msg
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.1
Patch-ID: bash51-005
Bug-Reported-by:Alexander Mescheryakov ,
konsolebox
Bug-Reference-ID: <5ffd7f3d.1c69fb81.dee25.1...@mx.google.com>
Date:Tue, 4 May 2021 09:28:04 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID:
| The issue with the BSDs and terminal devices is that the current code
| only checks for -1/ESPIPE, but they return a different value for errno
| (EINVAL? I forget.)
On traditional unix, since fo
2021年5月4日(火) 22:28 Chet Ramey :
> On 5/4/21 2:31 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > (1) Suggestion: use buffered read for a regular file for delim != '\n'?
> >
> >> It won't work on any system that doesn't return -1/ESPIPE when you try
> >> to lseek on a terminal device.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > lseek(2) ma
On 5/4/21 2:31 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
I'm still thinking about whether it is possible to use buffered read
in more cases of mapfile.
(1) Suggestion: use buffered read for a regular file for delim != '\n'?
It won't work on any system that doesn't return -1/ESPIPE when you try
to lseek on a te
On Mai 04 2021, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/4/21 3:26 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Mai 03 2021, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>
>>> It won't work on any system that doesn't return -1/ESPIPE when you try
>>> to lseek on a terminal device. Glibc does;
>> Glibc doesn't do anything, it just uses what the kernel
On 5/4/21 3:26 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Mai 03 2021, Chet Ramey wrote:
It won't work on any system that doesn't return -1/ESPIPE when you try
to lseek on a terminal device. Glibc does;
Glibc doesn't do anything, it just uses what the kernel says.
You'd think, but the manual says otherwi
On Mai 03 2021, Chet Ramey wrote:
> It won't work on any system that doesn't return -1/ESPIPE when you try
> to lseek on a terminal device. Glibc does;
Glibc doesn't do anything, it just uses what the kernel says.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB4
12 matches
Mail list logo
