On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:01:14PM +0300, Oğuz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:02 PM Eric Cook wrote:
>
> > in typeset -A ary=([key]=) an explicit empty string is the value
>
> No. An "explicit" empty string would be '', "", or something like that.
> After `=' a value is expected but it's not
Date:Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:01:14 +0300
From:=?UTF-8?B?T8SfdXo=?=
Message-ID:
| No. An "explicit" empty string would be '', "", or something like that.
No, not in sh it isn't - all quotes do is hide the effects of special
characters (and prevent some uses, eg: as a
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:02 PM Eric Cook wrote:
> in typeset -A ary=([key]=) an explicit empty string is the value
No. An "explicit" empty string would be '', "", or something like that.
After `=' a value is expected but it's not there, so `[key]' is assigned
the empty string. `typeset -A ary=
On 3/28/21 7:02 AM, Oğuz wrote:
As it should be. `[bar]' doesn't qualify as an assignment without an equals
sign, the shell thinks you're mixing two forms of associative array assignment
there.
In the new form, that a key is listed inside a compound assignment alone
implies that it was meant
28 Mart 2021 Pazar tarihinde Ilkka Virta yazdı:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:16 AM Oğuz wrote:
>
>> That an idea was borrowed from another shell doesn't mean it should be
>> implemented the same kludgy way. Besides, bash doesn't offer compatibility
>> with zsh.
>>
>
> You don't think the realm o
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:16 AM Oğuz wrote:
> That an idea was borrowed from another shell doesn't mean it should be
> implemented the same kludgy way. Besides, bash doesn't offer compatibility
> with zsh.
>
You don't think the realm of POSIX-ish shells already has enough
incompatibilities
and
28 Mart 2021 Pazar tarihinde Eric Cook yazdı:
>
> 1) For consistency sake with the shell the idea was borrowed from mostly.
That an idea was borrowed from another shell doesn't mean it should be
implemented the same kludgy way. Besides, bash doesn't offer compatibility
with zsh.
> 2) Prior to
