2021年2月11日(木) 7:28 Chet Ramey :
> On 2/10/21 6:21 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > 2021年2月11日(木) 7:02 Chet Ramey :
> >> You'll have to hook the timeout code into the pselect/select calls, as you
> >> suspect. Take a shot and it and send me what you come up with.
> >
> > Thank you for the comment. I'll
On 2/10/21 6:21 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
2021年2月11日(木) 7:02 Chet Ramey :
You'll have to hook the timeout code into the pselect/select calls, as you
suspect. Take a shot and it and send me what you come up with.
Chet
Thank you for the comment. I'll try it when I have time this week.
Let me k
2021年2月11日(木) 7:02 Chet Ramey :
> You'll have to hook the timeout code into the pselect/select calls, as you
> suspect. Take a shot and it and send me what you come up with.
>
> Chet
Thank you for the comment. I'll try it when I have time this week.
Koichi
On 2/10/21 11:59 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
I'd also like to know how this is going to work with read -e and readline,
since those don't seem to know anything about the timer.
OK, that is a good point. I completely forgot about `read -e'. I took
a look at `rl_getc (stream)' (lib/readline/input.c
2021年2月10日(水) 23:40 Chet Ramey :
> On 2/10/21 10:21 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > Thanks for the analysis and patch. I'll take a look. At first glance, I
> > would like to find a simpler way to do it.
Thank you. Yes, if there is a simpler but still robust and reliable
way to do it, that would be nice.
On 2/10/21 10:21 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 2/8/21 9:37 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
Instead, I believe, it is more natural to use `select(2)', which is
already used to implement `read -t 0'. In the attached patch
`0001-Use-select-2-for-the-read-timeout.patch', I used `select(2)'
to impl
On 2/8/21 9:37 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
Instead, I believe, it is more natural to use `select(2)', which is
already used to implement `read -t 0'. In the attached patch
`0001-Use-select-2-for-the-read-timeout.patch', I used `select(2)'
to implement the timeout of `read(2)'. When `s
On 2/10/21 2:10 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 09 Feb 2021 16:40, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 2/9/21 11:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
we're on bash-4.3 atm. we would upgrade to the latest if that were actually
a reliable process. unfortunately, moving between bash versions is often full
of random reg
