Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar # << thanks!

2020-07-07 Thread Chet Ramey
On 7/6/20 9:45 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: > bug-b...@trodman.com writes: >> foo | tee >(cat >&2) | bar > > I do wonder how portable >( ... ) is in practice, versus the portability > of /dev/stderr. It's portable in the sense that it's available wherever bash is. -- ``The lyf so short, the

Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar # << thanks!

2020-07-07 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 07:41:51AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:45:59PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: > > bug-b...@trodman.com writes: > > > foo | tee >(cat >&2) | bar > > > > I do wonder how portable >( ... ) is in practice, versus the portability > > of /dev/stderr

Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar # << thanks!

2020-07-07 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:45:59PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: > bug-b...@trodman.com writes: > > foo | tee >(cat >&2) | bar > > I do wonder how portable >( ... ) is in practice, versus the portability > of /dev/stderr. Maybe I worry about the former because I'm not > practiced in named-FIFO