On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 19:05 +0200, Vaidas BoQsc wrote:
> I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better
> than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor
> better alternatives.
> I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make t
On 3/25/20 10:35 AM, Valentin Lab wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have encountered an issue when running some bash code from 4.4 on a bash
> 5 ... I've managed to pinpoint the exact issue on my end.
Thanks for the report. This is a bug in bash-5.0, and I will have a fix in
the next devel branch push.
Chet
-
> I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better
> than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor
> better alternatives.
> I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make
> them
> less mentally demanding and readable in the com
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:05:58 +0200, Vaidas BoQsc wrote:
> I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better
> than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor
> better alternatives.
> I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make
I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better
than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor
better alternatives.
I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make them
less mentally demanding and readable in the command prompt
