Re: Binding Containing Escape Key Fails to Escape History Search

On 2019-11-04 14:41, Chet Ramey wrote: If \ef and Alt+f generate distinct character sequences, you can bind them separately. If they don't, you can't. This has nothing to do with whether or not incremental searching expands keyboard macros. In that case, how would one go about binding æ such

Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion

On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 11:00:03AM +0100, Martin Schulte wrote: > Hello, > > thanks a lot for all the answers! > > I would like to suppose (Ilkka already argued in this direction) that in > future versions of bash {x..C} should expand to x y z A B C. > > Best regards, > > Martin Another idea w

Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion

Hello, thanks a lot for all the answers! I would like to suppose (Ilkka already argued in this direction) that in future versions of bash {x..C} should expand to x y z A B C. Best regards, Martin

Re: [PATCH] allow process substitution in POSIX mode

Op 08-12-19 om 10:29 schreef Oğuz: I think otherwise. In POSIX mode Bash should at least print warnings about features POSIX lets implementations provide but doesn't mandate, like function, select, [[, etc. That would be a far bigger change than just allowing process substitution. Also, there

Re: [PATCH] allow process substitution in POSIX mode

I think otherwise. In POSIX mode Bash should at least print warnings about features POSIX lets implementations provide but doesn't mandate, like function, select, [[, etc. -- Oğuz