On 11/20/19 9:54 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:51:12 -0300
From:Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Message-ID:
| And two related features requests: 1) It seems that pids args are ignored
| by wait when '-n' is specified. However, it would be a nic
On 11/22/19 10:04 AM, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
HP-UX 11.23/ia64 using GNU gcc-4.6.1 does not know about O_CLOEXEC
Thanks for the report. There's a better patch in the devel branch.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - H
HP-UX 11.23/ia64 using GNU gcc-4.6.1 does not know about O_CLOEXEC
--8<---
--- examples/loadables/fdflags.c.org2019-11-22 16:03:07 +
+++ examples/loadables/fdflags.c2019-11-22 16:00:54 +
@@ -113,8 +113,10 @@ getflags(int fd, int p)
return -1;
}
+#ifdef O_CLOEXEC
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:02 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> This behavior dates from at least 2009 and was added at user request so
> they could tell exactly that: whether or not entering the last command had
> been interrupted by a signal.
>
Curious why people care about this?
-clark
