On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:36 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 9/23/19 7:32 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:37 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/9/19 2:39 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> >>> Any chance we can revive this patch now that Bash 5 is out? (The patch
> >>> itself,
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 09:29 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 9/24/19 3:04 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> > Hi Kerin,
> >
> > That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
> > recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
> > manpage.
> >
> > Did you have a look
On 9/24/19 3:04 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
> recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
> manpage.
>
> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
> '-N' switch com
Strange, it seems the replies did come through. So have you seen them?
Let's try the gnome mail client, at least I got a receipt this time.
Regards,
Mischa.
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 09:04 +0200, Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
Hi Kerin,
That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
manpage.
Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
'-N' switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
R
