On 5/23/19 5:11 PM, Hengyang Zhao wrote:
> Awesome! Could you please cc the fix to this thread once it's done? Thank you!
It's in the devel branch. I've attached the relevant piece.
This is more confirmation that it was a mistake to apply the DEBUG trap to
simple commands in pipelines.
--
``Th
On 5/28/19 12:15 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> Might be better to ask about this on a Debian mailing list.
>
> Arch Linux provides the builtins in the main bash package, and we too
> have most but not all.
>
> Looking at examples/loadables/Makefile.in, only the ones listed in
> ALLPROG are installe
On 5/28/19 12:09 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:04:10AM +1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> In fact, the bash-doc package contains dozens of examples. However, I
>> don't see anything named "rm". (I'm looking at bash-doc 5.0-4 in Debian
>> 10, "buster".)
>
> Looks like th
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:04:10AM +1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> In fact, the bash-doc package contains dozens of examples. However, I
> don't see anything named "rm". (I'm looking at bash-doc 5.0-4 in Debian
> 10, "buster".)
Looks like they're supposed to be in bash-builtins.
wooledg:~$
At 2019-05-28T17:01:52+0200, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from
> examples/,
That doesn't sound accurate to me. The Debian Policy Manual, §12.6,
encourages the shipping of examples:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#examples
In
On 5/28/19 4:38 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/28/19 8:32 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>
>> configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry.
>> #
>>
>> Is it possible to fix the loadable 'rm' command ?
>> Let me know if you want me to provide a patch.
>
> Well, it's hard to know exactly what the
On 5/28/19 11:01 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from examples/,
> how can we get the rm loadable into builtins/ ? (What is missing that
> has to be done).
That's up to Debian. I'm not going to make it a full-fledged builtin.
--
``The lyf so sho
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:43:42PM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:56:04AM +, r...@minigeek.srve.com wrote:
> > Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> > Machine: x86_64
> > OS: linux-gnu
> > Compiler: gcc
> > Compilation CFLAG
On 5/28/19 10:38 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/28/19 8:32 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>
>> configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry.
>> #
>>
>> Is it possible to fix the loadable 'rm' command ?
>> Let me know if you want me to provide a patch.
>
> Well, it's hard to know exactly what th
On 5/28/19 7:56 AM, r...@minigeek.srve.com wrote:
> Bash Version: 4.1
> Patch Level: 2
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> I deleted the file .DS_Store fom a fat32 partition as root. bash
> properly warned me and I answered y which deleted that file.
> A second different fi
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:56:04AM +, r...@minigeek.srve.com wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: x86_64
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTY
On 5/28/19 8:32 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> configure: error: Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry.
> #
>
> Is it possible to fix the loadable 'rm' command ?
> Let me know if you want me to provide a patch.
Well, it's hard to know exactly what the problem is here, despite the
volumes of text prod
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 06:21:27PM -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
> Problem happened when I re-used a var that had earlier had the
> integer property set on the variable.
>
> declare -i a=123
That's (part of) why I strongly recommend that nobody ever use that -i
flag.
> then later
> a="▯"
> -bash: ▯: s
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='redhat' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale'
Hi,
I just built bash from git master
(3ba697465bc74fab513a26dea700cc82e9f4724e) and enabled the 'rm' loadable via
enable -f ~/src/bash/examples/loadables/rm rm
Now, the next './configure' (autotools) says:
#
rm: usage: rm [-rf] file ...
Oops!
Your 'rm' program seems unable to run withou
On 25/05/2019 11:14, Henning wrote:
On 24/05/2019 17:16, Chet Ramey wrote:
That's not in the distributed version of bash-5.0. If you're applying an
older cygwin patch, have you tried just building the distributed version?
Let's make sure that works.
Bang! It does. So sorry that I didn't have
16 matches
Mail list logo
