Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On 4/22/19 1:54 PM, Vladimir Marek wrote: > Bash is one of the components we follow closely, so I'll be filing > internal bugs to update to latest patch level tomorrow. The Makefile > lists requirements > > REQUIRED_PACKAGES += library/ncurses > REQUIRED_PACKAGES += shell/ksh93 > REQUIRED_PACKAGE

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On 4/22/19 12:54 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 4/22/19 9:53 AM, Chet Ramey wrote: >> BASH PATCH REPORT >> = >> >> Bash-Release:    5.0 >> Patch-ID:    bash50-007 >> > > I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server : > >     https://ftp.gnu.

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

> >>I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. As for "commercial" UNIX > >>like Solaris, well, that platform is on life support and a nightmare to > >>deal with. So no sense in wasting time there anymore. > > > >I'm sorry to hear that Solaris is a nightmare. Solaris 11.4 (the current > >supporte

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On 4/22/19 1:54 PM, Vladimir Marek wrote: Hi, I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. As for "commercial" UNIX like Solaris, well, that platform is on life support and a nightmare to deal with. So no sense in wasting time there anymore. I'm sorry to hear that Solaris is a nightmare. Sola

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

Hi, > I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. As for "commercial" UNIX > like Solaris, well, that platform is on life support and a nightmare to > deal with. So no sense in wasting time there anymore. I'm sorry to hear that Solaris is a nightmare. Solaris 11.4 (the current supported version)

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On 4/22/19 1:26 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. It's not only in sid; it's also in buster. Here's the relevant excerpt from the changelog: bash (5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium Well golly

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. It's not only in sid; it's also in buster. Here's the relevant excerpt from the changelog: bash (5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. -- Matthias Klose Mon, 14

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On 4/22/19 1:01 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:54:28PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server : https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-5.0-patches/ So I will try again from the sources but am curious if there is a definitive lis

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:54:28PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server : > > https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-5.0-patches/ > > So I will try again from the sources but am curious if there is a definitive > list of dependencies that bash 5.0.7

Re: Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

On 4/22/19 9:53 AM, Chet Ramey wrote: BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 5.0 Patch-ID: bash50-007 I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server : https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-5.0-patches/ So

Bash-5.0 Official patch 7

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 5.0 Patch-ID: bash50-007 Bug-Reported-by:Grisha Levit Bug-Reference-ID: Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2019-02/msg00067.html B

Bash-5.0 Official patch 5

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 5.0 Patch-ID: bash50-005 Bug-Reported-by:Brad Spencer Bug-Reference-ID: <1b993ff2-ce4f-662a-6be4-393457362...@blackberry.com> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gn

Bash-5.0 Official patch 6

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 5.0 Patch-ID: bash50-006 Bug-Reported-by:Tomas Mozes Bug-Reference-ID: Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2019-03/msg00037.html Bu

Bash-5.0 Official patch 4

BASH PATCH REPORT = Bash-Release: 5.0 Patch-ID: bash50-004 Bug-Reported-by:Daniel Kahn Gillmor Bug-Reference-ID: <87lg0g8aiw@fifthhorseman.net> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archiv