On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:52:20PM -0400, Bize Ma wrote:
(...)
> That version is not even beta, it is still alpha, are you asking that
> everyone should use
> non-released (and not yet tested as beta) alpha release ?
(...)
I didn't say that. My point is that, in the context of bug reports, it's
im
2018-08-13 22:09 GMT-04:00 Eduardo A. Bustamante López :
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:36:23PM -0400, Bize Ma wrote:
> (...)
> > Please, do not waste our time in incorrect claims.
> >
> > Do your homework and test !
> (...)
>
>
> dualbus@ubuntu:~/src/gnu/bash$ bash /tmp/script
> 4.4.19(1)-releas
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:36:23PM -0400, Bize Ma wrote:
(...)
> Please, do not waste our time in incorrect claims.
>
> Do your homework and test !
(...)
Did you test Bash 5.0? Because that's where the current bug fixes are going to.
I don't see Chet releasing a new version of 4.4 to fix somethin
2018-08-13 21:16 GMT-04:00 Eduardo Bustamante :
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:25 PM Robert Elz wrote:
> [...]
> > What's more, reporting bugs in bash 4.3 is just a waste of everyone's
> time.
> > Upgrade to (at least) the current released version, and use that instead.
>
> Adding to this point:
>
>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:25 PM Robert Elz wrote:
[...]
> What's more, reporting bugs in bash 4.3 is just a waste of everyone's time.
> Upgrade to (at least) the current released version, and use that instead.
Adding to this point:
* bash 4.3 was released 4 years ago (2014-02-26)
* bash 4.4 is t
Date:Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:51:08 -0400
From:Bize Ma
Message-ID:
| Bash since 4.3 fails to follow what the documentation describes as that on
| an assignment values do not undergo splitting or globing.
This is already fixed.
What's more, reporting bugs in bash 4.
Executing this code:
set -- " foo "" bar baz " " quux "
unset IFS
a=$*
b="$*"
printf '[%s]' "$a" "$b"; echo
Leads to this results in several shells:
ash : [ foo bar baz quux ][ foo bar baz
quux ]
dash: [ foo bar baz
Yes Greg, Please read the expanded source question, bash 5 with (and
without) bash-malloc has been tested.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/462084/265604
The problem with arguments is still present.
2018-08-13 9:37 GMT-04:00 Greg Wooledge :
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:16:34AM -0400, Bize M
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:16:34AM -0400, Bize Ma wrote:
> Which is a thousand times slower.
> Bash 5 is even worse
Pre-release bash sources use a debugging-friendly (slow) malloc. Or
something. Damn, google is not helping me out here.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 09:26:56PM -0700, Mark Polyakov wrote:
>Bash Version: 4.3
>Patch Level: 46
>A A A An extglob pattern such as `*?(anything)something_else` will
>match any string, even though it should only match strings that end
>with something_else.
This appears to be
On 08/06/2018 03:07 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
Hi. I am considering making bash glob expansion implement rational range
interpretation starting with bash-5.0 -- basically making globasciiranges
the default. It looks like glibc is going to do this for version 2.28 (at
least for a-z, A-Z, and 0-9), and o
11 matches
Mail list logo
