On 2/13/18 11:23 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> It would be nice if bash's malloc implementation could be fixed to also
>>> work under qemu-user.
>>
>> Does sbrk(2) work in a PIE-enabled environment?
>
> Note that a bash binary compiled with PIE
Hello,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > It would be nice if bash's malloc implementation could be fixed to also
> > work under qemu-user.
>
> Does sbrk(2) work in a PIE-enabled environment?
Note that a bash binary compiled with PIE works fine for normal usage
with a current Linux kerne
On 2/13/18 6:41 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in Debian we wanted to build bash with PIE enabled [1], but we discovered that
> bash was broken under qemu-user when it was compiled that way [2].
>
> It turns out that it's broken only when it uses bash's malloc
> implementation. If we bui
Hello,
in Debian we wanted to build bash with PIE enabled [1], but we discovered that
bash was broken under qemu-user when it was compiled that way [2].
It turns out that it's broken only when it uses bash's malloc
implementation. If we build bash with PIE and --without-bash-malloc then
we don't
