Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKA
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKA
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Out of morbid curiosity, has a date been set for the release of
> "readline-7.0"? I know that there is an "RC" version in the wild right
> now.
It's been released already.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-09/msg00013.html
Out of morbid curiosity, has a date been set for the release of
"readline-7.0"? I know that there is an "RC" version in the wild right
now.
--
Gerard
Tom McCurdy wrote:
Bash Version: 4.3
Patch Level: 11
Release Status: release
Description:
Two nearly identical "For Loop" setups have large deltas in
performance. See test program below. Was confirmed in IRC chat room by
multiple users. Input is very noticeable with around 100,000 valu