On Tue 18 Mar 2014 21:11:07 Linda Walsh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue 18 Mar 2014 01:04:03 Linda Walsh wrote:
> >> Chet Ramey wrote:
> >>> Because the execution fails in a child process. You'd be able to fix it
> >>> for that process, but would do nothing about the contents of the pare
Hello, guys:
It is said that "ctrl-C sends INT to ALL processes under foreground job", but i
found a weird phenomenon.
I have not read source code yet, but it does not seem to ascribe to what
specification says.
Test code is like:
1 trap "echo hello world $1" 2
2 slee
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue 18 Mar 2014 01:04:03 Linda Walsh wrote:
Chet Ramey wrote:
Because the execution fails in a child process. You'd be able to fix it
for that process, but would do nothing about the contents of the parent
shell's hash table.
The way the option works now is to check
On Sun 16 Mar 2014 13:30:55 Andrew Kosteltsev wrote:
> When we build bash for some targets the INCLUDES variable for BUILD_CC
> contains the path to target readline headers. This path points to the
> target headers which not preferred for utilities which prepared for build
> machine.
>
> Also when
On Tue 18 Mar 2014 01:04:03 Linda Walsh wrote:
> Chet Ramey wrote:
> > Because the execution fails in a child process. You'd be able to fix it
> > for that process, but would do nothing about the contents of the parent
> > shell's hash table.
> >
> > The way the option works now is to check the h
On 3/18/14 5:36 AM, geir.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
> Bash Version: 4.3
> Patch Level: 0
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> With an associative array, assoc, ${assoc[key]+set} expands to the
> empty string if the associated value is the empty string.
Thanks for the report. This wa
With bash-4.3 as found on Debian's 4.3-2 package:
$ bash -cO extglob 'echo *(.)'
. ..
$ bash -cO extglob 'echo *(foo)*'
. .. a
$ bash -cO extglob 'echo @(|foo)*'
. .. a
It looks like the regression was introduced by 4.3, as 4.2 doesn't exhibit the
same problem.
This one's OK:
$ bash -cO extglo
2014-02-04 09:23:21 -0500, Chet Ramey:
> On 1/25/14 6:11 PM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> > 2014-01-21 10:19:10 -0500, Chet Ramey:
> > [...]
> >>> I am not so worried about the method used to "fix" globstar -- whether
> >>> we keep backwards compatibility or not -- I am more concerned that we
> >>> h
On 18 March 2014 08:04, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>
>> Because the execution fails in a child process. You'd be able to fix it
>> for that process, but would do nothing about the contents of the parent
>> shell's hash table.
>>
>> The way the option works now is to check the has
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='unknown' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/local/share
Chet Ramey wrote:
Because the execution fails in a child process. You'd be able to fix it
for that process, but would do nothing about the contents of the parent
shell's hash table.
The way the option works now is to check the hash lookups and delete
anything that is no longer an executable f
11 matches
Mail list logo