On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:21:11PM -0700, Eduardo A. Bustamante López wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Andreas Gregor Frank wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> >
> > this is a feature request for no_such_file_or_directory_
> > handle(). I do not want to talk about missing quotes in anyone's
On 2013-08-21 13:12, Ken Irving wrote:
> Yes I do have some idea. I read the bash-bug list regularly, and many
> times (even if you can't tell) refer to the wiki you host, read the FAQs,
> RTFMs, try to absorb what wisdom I can, and in general try to improve on
> the bash coding I do use. But thi
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:10:50AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:22:24AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
> > $ cat $(ambler.method dispatch)
> > #!/bin/bash
> > method=$1 && shift
> > test -n "$method" || exit
> > for s in $(ls|shuf); do
> > tob $s.$m
There appears to be a redundancy in the description of the "disown"
builtin in bash(1). Version is 4.2.
disown [-ar] [-h] [jobspec ...]
[...] If jobspec is not
present, and neither -a nor -r is supplied,
the shell's notion of the current job is used.
Hi Eduardo,
thank you very much for this constructive and honest answer.
Not what i hoped to see, but this is only a request.
For me only a nice to have...so fine
bye
Andreas
2013/8/21 Eduardo A. Bustamante López
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Andreas Gregor Frank wrote:
> > Hell
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Andreas Gregor Frank wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> this is a feature request for no_such_file_or_directory_
> handle(). I do not want to talk about missing quotes in anyone's code
> example!
You are free to send patches with the proposed feature. That way we
w
Hello Greg,
this is a feature request for no_such_file_or_directory_
handle(). I do not want to talk about missing quotes in anyone's code
example!
And the question if it makes sense to implement a
command_not_found_handle() in this or that way has nothing to do with this
request, too.
How someone
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:22:24AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
> $ cat $(ambler.method dispatch)
> #!/bin/bash
> method=$1 && shift
> test -n "$method" || exit
> for s in $(ls|shuf); do
> tob $s.$method "$@" &
> done
As far as I can tell, this is some incredibly stupid
Chris Down wrote:
On 2013-08-20 18:47, Linda Walsh wrote:
If it wasn't for things doing what we don't expect, many things wouldn't be
around (aspirin, popcorn, digitalis, Rogain, & tons more... most things are
found by NOT using them they way you are directed to use them).
This is such a poo
On 2013-08-20 18:47, Linda Walsh wrote:
> If it wasn't for things doing what we don't expect, many things wouldn't be
> around (aspirin, popcorn, digitalis, Rogain, & tons more... most things are
> found by NOT using them they way you are directed to use them).
This is such a poor analogy that I d
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
> You are badly using features of bash. Write a script which will do
> things for you, or use any other language/shell.
There's only one feature being used, a hook that bash calls in
the event that a command is not found. The request i
11 matches
Mail list logo
