Am 06.03.2013 01:03, schrieb Linda Walsh:
>
> John Kearney wrote:
>> The example is bad anyway as you normally don't want to parallelize disk
>> io , due to seek overhead and io bottle neck congestion. This example
>> will be slower and more likely to damage your disk than simply using mv
>> on its
John Kearney wrote:
> The example is bad anyway as you normally don't want to parallelize disk
> io , due to seek overhead and io bottle neck congestion. This example
> will be slower and more likely to damage your disk than simply using mv
> on its own. but thats another discussion.
---
On 3/4/13 11:12 AM, Gotmy Nick wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 14:51, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>
>> This isn't accurate. Run the following script:
>>
>> foo()
>> {
>> echo foo
>> }
>> bar=quux
>>
>> readonly foo
>> readonly bar
>>
>> readonly
>>
>> In addition to the built-in bash readonly variables,
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='unknown'
-DLOCALEDIR='/home/mjackson/src