> this is actually more disturbing.
>
> ls | parallel mv {} destdir
>
> find -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -I{} -P /bin/mv {}
If we're really going to pick nits here, those two aren't really identical.
You'd probably want something like
find . -depth 1 \! -name '.*' -print0
to start.
Chet
--
I'm getting a chance to look at this.
> this is actually more disturbing.
>
> ls | parallel mv {} destdir
That's straight from the parallel manual. Pretty much all of the examples
are from the parallel manual.
Ole Tange, GNU parallel's author, supplied the text and examples. It
would be more
On 3/2/13 8:52 AM, Fabrizio Gennari wrote:
> Hello,
> with this patch I successfully compiled Bash 4.2 using a DJGPP
> cross-compiler running under Linux (Ubuntu 12.10). May this be applied?
Thanks for the report. All of these patches, or equivalent, except for the
SIGCHLD check in malloc.c (than
Apparently Gmail has now started mangling attachments. Must be recent. My bad.
Chris
On 2 March 2013 23:11, Fabrizio Gennari wrote:
> Strange, I checked it and even downloaded it again from the list archive at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2013-03/txtu9EivjW9Sd.txt : there
> are n
Strange, I checked it and even downloaded it again from the list archive
at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2013-03/txtu9EivjW9Sd.txt
: there are no carriage returns, only newlines
Il 02/03/2013 15:17, Chris Down ha scritto:
Your patch appears to be mangled with carriage returns.
O
Your patch appears to be mangled with carriage returns.
On 2 March 2013 21:52, Fabrizio Gennari wrote:
> Hello,
> with this patch I successfully compiled Bash 4.2 using a DJGPP
> cross-compiler running under Linux (Ubuntu 12.10). May this be applied?
>
> Regards,
> Fabrizio
Hello,
with this patch I successfully compiled Bash 4.2 using a DJGPP
cross-compiler running under Linux (Ubuntu 12.10). May this be applied?
Regards,
Fabrizio
diff -ru bash-4.2/execute_cmd.c bash-4.2patch/execute_cmd.c
--- bash-4.2/execute_cmd.c 2011-02-09 23:32:25.0 +0100
+++ bash-4.2
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:27:31 +0200, Idan Kamara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use the completion system to get a list of available
> options for a command bash knows how to auto-complete?
>
> Ideally, I'd like given the name of a program to get a list of pairs
> (option string, desc) for ea
