Am 13.01.2013 00:04, schrieb Chet Ramey:
> On 1/12/13 10:07 AM, John Kearney wrote:
>
>> regarding -e it mainly has a bad name because there is no good guide how
>> to program with it.
>> so for example this causes stress
>> [ ! -d ${dirname} ] && mkdir ${dirname}
>> because if the dir exists it wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/9/13 1:49 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
> Hi. These were easy for me to reproduce in various versions.
>
> Export to mapfile the variable to be assigned, then run any callback:
> $ printf '%s\n' {a..z} | bash -xc 'a= mapfile -tc1 -C : a'
> +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/11/13 1:17 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
> Whether or not this type of error aborts depends upon there being an actual
> newline.
It doesn't actually abort the script itself; the assignment error causes
the current command to be aborted. Posix mode do
On 1/12/13 10:07 AM, John Kearney wrote:
> regarding -e it mainly has a bad name because there is no good guide how
> to program with it.
> so for example this causes stress
> [ ! -d ${dirname} ] && mkdir ${dirname}
> because if the dir exists it will exit the scripts :)
I'm not sure this is what
Am 12.01.2013 20:40, schrieb Chet Ramey:
> On 1/12/13 9:48 AM, John Kearney wrote:
>
>> anyway now we have a point I disagree that
>> "${@}"
>>
>> should expand to 0 or more words, from the documentation it should be 1
>> or more. At least that is how I read that paragragh. IT says it will
>> spli
On 1/12/13 9:48 AM, John Kearney wrote:
> anyway now we have a point I disagree that
> "${@}"
>
> should expand to 0 or more words, from the documentation it should be 1
> or more. At least that is how I read that paragragh. IT says it will
> split the word not make the word vanish.
> so I had t
Am 12.01.2013 14:53, schrieb Dan Douglas:
> Yes some use -u / -e for debugging apparently. Actual logic relying upon
> those
> can be fragile of course. I prefer when things return nonzero instead of
> throwing errors usually so that they're handleable.
ah but you can still do that if you want
Am 12.01.2013 15:34, schrieb Dan Douglas:
> On Friday, January 11, 2013 10:39:19 PM Dan Douglas wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 12, 2013 02:35:34 AM John Kearney wrote:
>> BTW, your wrappers won't work. A wrapper would need to implement format
> Hrmf I should have clarified that I only meant A comp
On Friday, January 11, 2013 10:39:19 PM Dan Douglas wrote:
> On Saturday, January 12, 2013 02:35:34 AM John Kearney wrote:
> BTW, your wrappers won't work. A wrapper would need to implement format
Hrmf I should have clarified that I only meant A complete printf wrapper would
be difficult. A sing
Yes some use -u / -e for debugging apparently. Actual logic relying upon those
can be fragile of course. I prefer when things return nonzero instead of
throwing errors usually so that they're handleable.
--
Dan Douglas
10 matches
Mail list logo
