On 02/22/2012 10:02 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> Eric Blake wrote:
>
>>
>> Don't think of it as 'wide-int', rather, think of it as 'the integral
>> type that both contains wchar_t and WEOF'. You cannot write 'signed
>> wint_t' nor 'unsigned 'wint_t'.
>
>
> ---
> ?? You say don't think of it t
And on the up side if they do ever give in and allow registration of
family name characters we may get a wchar_t, schar_t lwchar_t and a
llwchar_t
:)
just imagine a variable length 64bit char system.
Everything from Sumerian to Klingon in Unicode, though I think they
already are, though not offici
Eric Blake wrote:
Don't think of it as 'wide-int', rather, think of it as 'the integral
type that both contains wchar_t and WEOF'. You cannot write 'signed
wint_t' nor 'unsigned 'wint_t'.
---
?? You say don't think of it that way, but unless I missed something,
just like wchar stood for '
On 02/22/2012 07:43 PM, John Kearney wrote:
> ^ caviot you can represent the full 0x10 in UTF-16, you just need 2
> UTF-16 characters. check out the latest version of unicode.c for an
> example how.
Yes, and Cygwin actually does this.
A strict reading of POSIX states that wchar_t must be wide
^ caviot you can represent the full 0x10 in UTF-16, you just need 2
UTF-16 characters. check out the latest version of unicode.c for an
example how.
On 02/22/2012 11:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 03:01 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> My question had to do with an unqualified wint_t no
On 02/22/2012 03:01 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> My question had to do with an unqualified wint_t not
> unsigned wint_t and what platform existed where an 'int' type or
> wide-int_t, was, without qualifiers, unsigned. I still would like
> to know -- and posix allows int/wide-ints to be unsigned wi
Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/22/2012 05:19 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
Not only can wchar_t can be either signed or unsigned, you also have to
worry about platforms where it is only 16 bits, such as cygwin; on the
other hand, wint_t is always 32 bits, but you still have the issue
On 02/22/2012 12:55 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/21/12 5:07 PM, John Kearney wrote:
>>
>> Initial code for testing \u functionality.
>
> Thanks; this is really good work. In the limited testing I've done,
> ja_JP.SHIFT_JIS is rare and C.UTF-8 doesn't exist anywhere.
C.UTF-8 exists on Cygwin. Bu
On 2/21/12 5:07 PM, John Kearney wrote:
>
> Initial code for testing \u functionality.
Thanks; this is really good work. In the limited testing I've done,
ja_JP.SHIFT_JIS is rare and C.UTF-8 doesn't exist anywhere. ja_JP.SJIS
is a somewhat less rare substitute for the former, and en_US.UTF-8 se
On 2/22/12 2:47 AM, John Kearney wrote:
> Bash Version: 4.2
> Patch Level: 10
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> printf "%q" "~" not escaped?
>
> which means that this
> eval echo $(printf "%q" "~")
> results in your home path not a ~
> unlike
> eval echo $(printf "%q" "*")
>
> as far
On 02/22/2012 01:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 05:19 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>>
>>
>> Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Not only can wchar_t can be either signed or unsigned, you also have to
>>> worry about platforms where it is only 16 bits, such as cygwin; on the
>>> other hand, wint_t is al
On 02/22/2012 05:19 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> Eric Blake wrote:
>
>
>> Not only can wchar_t can be either signed or unsigned, you also have to
>> worry about platforms where it is only 16 bits, such as cygwin; on the
>> other hand, wint_t is always 32 bits, but you still have the issue that
Eric Blake wrote:
Not only can wchar_t can be either signed or unsigned, you also have to
worry about platforms where it is only 16 bits, such as cygwin; on the
other hand, wint_t is always 32 bits, but you still have the issue that
it can be either signed or unsigned.
What platform uses
On 02/20/2012 10:57 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
I'm not sure if it's a bug or not, but there is change between old bash
3.2 and bash 4.2.
When you run a script:
set -m
$(sleep 1; sleep 2)
in bash 4.2 the first sleep has same group id as parent shell. However
in bash 3.2 it has different group id.
Is
14 matches
Mail list logo
