Re: '>;' redirection operator

2011-12-24 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:08:34 -0600 Bill Gradwohl articulated: > My original post was only to suggest that instead of more bells and > whistles, talent should be applied towards the documentation of what > is already there. Bill, it is a well known fact that the developers of a product are usually

Re: '>;' redirection operator

2011-12-24 Thread Bill Gradwohl
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > I find it rather ironical that your rant should amount to a clumsy > rewording of section 6.1, GNU Manuals, from the GNU Coding Standards: > > http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/GNU-Manuals.html#GNU-Manuals > > Followed that link and

Re: '>;' redirection operator

2011-12-24 Thread Chris Jones
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:08:31AM EST, Bill Gradwohl wrote: [..] > The man page is written the way Robbie the Robot used to speak in the old > black and white TV days¹. Short, cryptic and in many cases unintelligible IN > THE DETAILS. Alternatively, one might snicker that some lawyer wrote it to

Re: '>;' redirection operator

2011-12-24 Thread Pierre Gaston
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Bill Gradwohl wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> People complain about the readability of code enough already, and as >> practice shows, things like [[ have been around and nobody uses them >> anyway (often using just POSIX, but

Re: '>;' redirection operator

2011-12-24 Thread Bill Gradwohl
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > People complain about the readability of code enough already, and as > practice shows, things like [[ have been around and nobody uses them > anyway (often using just POSIX, but not even knowing – myself included > – that POSIX sh has $((…

Re: [RFC] support 'COMP_WORDBREAKS' value on a per-completion basis

2011-12-24 Thread Raphaël Droz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Raphaël Droz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > > On 5/30/11 2:05 PM, Raphaël Droz wrote: > > > === Rationale: > > > Let's say you want to complete http URL (which contain ':'). > > > > > > The completion probably contai

Re: '>;' redirection operator

2011-12-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Eric Blake dixit: >powerful approach. Can we get buy-in from other shell developers to >support '>;' as an atomic temp-file replacement-on-success idiom, if Urgh, PLEASE NOT! People complain about the readability of code enough already, and as practice shows, things like [[ have been around and