On Thursday 01 December 2011 19:01:50 james.cuze...@lyraphase.com wrote:
> Description:
> popd does not appear to return a nonzero exit status when the directory
> stack is empty anymore.
works for me:
$ echo $BASH_VERSION ; popd ; echo $?
4.2.20(1)-release
bash: popd: directory stack empty
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:01 AM, wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: x86_64
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
> -DC
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKA
On 11/30/11 2:08 AM, Clark J. Wang wrote:
> (Tested with bash 4.2.10 and 4.1.9)
>
> [bash-4.2.10] # cat foo.compspec
> compspec_foo()
> {
> local cmd=$1 cur=$2 pre=$3
>
> if [[ $cur = :* ]]; then
> COMPREPLY=( changed changed/IGNORE_ME )
> fi
> }
>
> complete -F compspec_foo
On 11/29/11 9:53 AM, Yongzhi Pan wrote:
> Producing the bug:
>
> tux@dell:~$ shopt -s extglob
> tux@dell:~$ shopt -u dotglob
> tux@dell:~$ ls -d *(.*)
> ls: cannot access *(.*): No such file or directory
> tux@dell:~$ touch '*(.*)'
> tux@dell:~$ ls -d *(.*)
> *(.*)
>
> I think even if dotglob is
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:26:28AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> When I call,
>
> execute.sh ls > /tmp/tmp.txt
>
> I want it actually to do
>
> echo "ls > /tmp/tmp.txt"
> ls > /tmp/tmp.txt
That is impossible. The redirection, being unquoted, is performed by the
shell where you are actually typing th
> WHAT are you trying to DO?
I think that you might completely miss my point. I try to explain it
better. Let me know if this time it makes more sense to you.
I want to execute any command as if the 'execute.sh' does not present,
except that I want to print the command so that I know want the
com
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:00:10AM +0200, Pierre Gaston wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
> > $ ../execute.sh ls >/tmp/tmp.txt
What? You have a pipeline with nothing before it, and then another
pipeline with "ls" on the right hand side. But ls doesn't even read
from stdi
