On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Bill Gradwohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> when I typo a command, bash comes back with a command not found but
> hangs the terminal for way too long.
>
> How do I get rid of the delay. I want it to release the terminal
> immediately
In the bash 4.2 source:
jobs.c is not checking HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H.
This prevents it from compiling on VMS which does not supply this header.
Regards,
-John
wb8tyw@qsl.network
Personal Opinion Only
$ diff -ub a/jobs.c b/jobs.c
--- a/jobs.c 2011-09-26 22:28:17.0 -0500
+++ b/jobs.c
Bill Gradwohl wrote:
> when I typo a command, bash comes back with a command not found but
> hangs the terminal for way too long.
When you try to launch a command that does not exist anywhere on PATH
then bash must search every directory component of PATH in order to
look for the command.
> How d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
when I typo a command, bash comes back with a command not found but
hangs the terminal for way too long.
How do I get rid of the delay. I want it to release the terminal
immediately.
- --
Bill Gradwohl
Roatan, Honduras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On 10/7/11 3:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the current yacc rules allow multiple runs to generate the same files.
> usually
> this doesn't come up as the generated files are shipped in the tarball, but
> when you modify parse.y (applying a patch or developing or whatever), you can
> hit this pro
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Len Giambrone wrote:
> > I understand that. But if you change all your scripts to use
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> > instead of
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
> > your scripts will fail when bash isn't installed.
>
> If you use bash features in your script, then you must
On 10/05/2011 02:37 PM, Russ Browne wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
>
> Machine: i686
>
> OS: cygwin
>
> Compiler: gcc-4
>
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash.exe' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='cygwin'
Given that you are trying to use c
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:06:16AM -0400, Len Giambrone wrote:
> I understand that. But if you change all your scripts to use
>
> #!/bin/bash
> instead of
> #!/bin/sh
>
> your scripts will fail when bash isn't installed.
If you use bash features in your script, then you must ensure that the
scr
I understand that. But if you change all your scripts to use
#!/bin/bash
instead of
#!/bin/sh
your scripts will fail when bash isn't installed.
-Len
On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 02:54:56PM -0400, Len Giambrone wrote:
Many people now use sh and b
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 02:54:56PM -0400, Len Giambrone wrote:
> Many people now use sh and bash interchangeably.
That is wrong. Those people need to learn that sh and bash are NOT
interchangeable.
10 matches
Mail list logo