On 4/14/11 11:41 AM, Paolo Herms wrote:
> Bash Version: 4.2
> Patch Level: 8
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> In a bash script I have to switch on job control using set -m, as it seems to
> be the only way to trap a SIGCHLD as soon as a background process terminates.
> The documenta
On 04/14/2011 03:09 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
I'm not sure I understand this. Why is using a temporary handler better
than blocking the signal until the trap handler is in place, then
unblocking it and allowing any pending signal to be delivered?
I just want some way to not ignore the signal. For
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:07:16 +0800, Clark J. Wang wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Peter Toft wrote:
Hi all
I have been using tcsh for a long time on Red Hat Linux boxes, and
bash on other UNIX-boxes. One thing I really love with tcsh is the
way
I can swiftly operate using the to do
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Peter Toft wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have been using tcsh for a long time on Red Hat Linux boxes, and
> bash on other UNIX-boxes. One thing I really love with tcsh is the way
> I can swiftly operate using the to do auto-complete, when having
> a deep directory hierar
