2011-01-31, 11:44(-05), Greg Wooledge:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Pascal Wittmann wrote:
>> But if I use the expression ".*" in bash, I would expect from the
>> behaviour of "*", that
>> ".*" don't include the file "..". But the fact is, that it does in bash.
>
> This is done f
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Pascal Wittmann wrote:
> But if I use the expression ".*" in bash, I would expect from the
> behaviour of "*", that
> ".*" don't include the file "..". But the fact is, that it does in bash.
This is done for compatibility with all the other shells. If
Pascal Wittmann writes:
> The way that "*" is treated for globbing is not consitent. Normaly a
> regular expression "*"
> would match all characters, but for the sake of usability it doesn't
> include the files
> which starts with a dot (dotfiles) and the file "..".
".." is not in any way
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 1/25/11 10:08 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Dan reported a libtool performance regression in libtool-2.4 when running
>> his binaries with a large number of arguments.
>>
>> Libtool creates a shell script which usually sets some env
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i686
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='bash
On 1/30/11 3:50 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Dan McGee wrote on Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:04:17AM CET:
>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> On 1/25/11 10:08 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
for lt_wr_arg
do
case \$lt_wr_arg in
--lt-*) ;;
>>
On 1/31/11 4:57 AM, Marc Herbert wrote:
> Le 30/01/2011 00:12, Chet Ramey a écrit :
>> Is it a problem? Bash prints messages about signal-terminated processes --
>
>> Most people want to know when their jobs die
>
> ...except when they explicitly kill them.
Then maybe the answer is to suppress
Le 30/01/2011 00:12, Chet Ramey a écrit :
> Is it a problem? Bash prints messages about signal-terminated processes --
> Most people want to know when their jobs die
...except when they explicitly kill them.
> at least those that don't die due to SIGINT or SIGPIPE -- when the
> shell is not int
