Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> I don't think this problem is related to any recent bash version
> only. I've seen this since years I think.
>
> Nevertheless I'm using GNU bash, version 4.0.17(1)-release
> (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) now.
I am using 4.1.5(1)-release and I could not recreate your p
On 10/30/10 5:13 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't think this problem is related to any recent bash version only. I've
> seen
> this since years I think.
>
> Nevertheless I'm using GNU bash, version 4.0.17(1)-release
> (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) now.
>
> My PS1 uses the "Ch
On 10/27/10 6:25 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Description:
> Bash does not behave well when under artificial fd pressure due to
> ulimit -n. It issues a spurious warning to stderr because it tries
> to save necessary fds starting at 10. Compare this with ksh93, which
> saves fds starting at 3.
>
> M
