Chuck Remes wrote:
> The standard .bashrc contains a line of code that precludes certain
> scripts from executing. It has to do with the logic for checking if
> the session is interactive.
>
> e.g.
> [ -z "$PS1" ] && return
>
> Usually a few other lines are included afterward to, for example,
> ali
Chuck Remes wrote:
> Some scripts like rvm (rvm.beginrescueend.com) need to run at the
> tail end of the login process to tack on more data to PATH or set
> other environment variables (think of it as a post-login
> hook). These kinds of scripts fail to execute with the code above.
Thank you for t
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='unknown' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/local
Peng Yu wrote:
> Is there a way to overload operators like '>' and '>>' in bash, just
> as overloading in C++, etc. Suppose I have already made some bash
> program using '>' and '>>' without thinking about symbolic link, but I
> begin aware of them later. I would be cumbersome to add a test
> state
Pierre Gaston wrote:
> Peng Yu wrote:
> > Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
> > write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
> > link generated a new file and write to it.
> >
> > pipe '>' will change file 1. I'm wondering if there is way to d
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Pierre Gaston wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
>> write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
>> link generated a new file and write to it.
>>
>> p
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
> write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
> link generated a new file and write to it.
>
> pipe '>' will change file 1. I'm wondering if there is way to d
Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
link generated a new file and write to it.
pipe '>' will change file 1. I'm wondering if there is way to do so,
so that I don't have to test whether it is a symbol
