On 2/7/10 8:33 PM, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> We encountered a strange bug while working on bash-completion. I was
> originally only able to reproduce this through a fairly elaborate setup
> but Freddy Vulto found a tiny test case:
>
> set -o posix
> t() {
> local x
> BA
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 14:18 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/8/10 12:22 PM, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > Well I'm trying get some answer , and nothing at all !
>
> What was wrong with
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2010-01/msg00056.html? That was
> a fine answer: an offset is a
On 2/8/10 12:22 PM, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> Well I'm trying get some answer , and nothing at all !
What was wrong with
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2010-01/msg00056.html? That was
a fine answer: an offset is an integer, an
index into an array of history entries.
--
``The l
Well I'm trying get some answer , and nothing at all !
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:05 -0500, Dave Rutherford wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 08:21, Sergio Monteiro Basto
> wrote:
> > Forwarded Message
> > From: Sergio Monteiro Basto
> > To: bug-bash@gnu.org
> > Subject: histo
Forwarded Message
From: Sergio Monteiro Basto
To: bug-bash@gnu.org
Subject: history position out of range
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:11:37 +
Hi,
How I delete history from entry 2 to entry 22
$ history -d 2:22
bash: history: 2:22: history position out of range
man history
