On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:51:31 +0100
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Matias A. Fonzo" writes:
>
> > A solution to check the broken symlink is:
> >
> > [ -e "foo" -o -L "foo" -a ! -e "foo" ]
>
> In which way is the last check not redundant?
>
In the sense that you have -e to check existing files and n
Am 12.12.2009 21:41, schrieb Chet Ramey:
On 12/12/09 5:28 AM, Bernd Eggink wrote:
Am 10.12.2009 10:40, schrieb konsolebox:
I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
option in typeset or declare like
On 12/12/09 5:28 AM, Bernd Eggink wrote:
> Am 10.12.2009 10:40, schrieb konsolebox:
>
>> I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
>> declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
>> option in typeset or declare like -g (same as zsh) and/or a builti
2009-12-12, 12:37(-05), Chet Ramey:
> On 12/12/09 5:24 AM, Bernd Eggink wrote:
>
>> It's the other way round. Regarding typeset and declare, the man page
>> says: " When used in a function, makes each name local, as with the
>> local command. " So within a function, typeset, declare, and local are
On 12/12/09 5:24 AM, Bernd Eggink wrote:
> It's the other way round. Regarding typeset and declare, the man page
> says: " When used in a function, makes each name local, as with the
> local command. " So within a function, typeset, declare, and local are
> synonyms. Using 'local' outside a funct
Am 12.12.2009 15:25, schrieb DennisW:
On Dec 12, 4:24 am, Bernd Eggink wrote:
Am 12.12.2009 02:11, schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
konsolebox wrote:
I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
option in typ
Am 12.12.2009 15:25, schrieb DennisW:
On Dec 12, 4:24 am, Bernd Eggink wrote:
Am 12.12.2009 02:11, schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
konsolebox wrote:
I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
option in typ
Hello again,
I have to reply to my own post to correct it:
On Dec 8, 2:00 pm, pjodrr wrote:
> coproc prefix_timestamp
> seq 10>&${COPROC[1]}
> eval "exec ${COPROC[1]}>&-"
> cat <&${COPROC[0]}
> wait $COPROC_PID
replace this with:
{ coproc prefix_timestamp >&3 ; } 3>&1
seq 10>&${COPROC[1]}
eval
On Dec 12, 4:24 am, Bernd Eggink wrote:
> Am 12.12.2009 02:11, schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
>
> > konsolebox wrote:
> >> I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
> >> declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
> >> option in typeset or declare like
Am 12.12.2009 11:24, schrieb Bernd Eggink:
Am 12.12.2009 02:11, schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
konsolebox wrote:
I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
option in typeset or declare like -g (same as zsh)
2009-12-11, 06:17(-07), Eric Blake:
>
> According to Roman Rakus on 12/11/2009 6:08 AM:
>> kill builtin incorrectly thinks that -PGID is signal name even if the
>> signal name is set by -s or -n option.
>>
>> [rra...@dhcp-lab-170 ~]$ kill -s TERM -5032
>> bash: kill: 5032: invalid signal specifica
2009-12-12, 11:28(+01), Bernd Eggink:
> Am 10.12.2009 10:40, schrieb konsolebox:
>
>> I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
>> declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
>> option in typeset or declare like -g (same as zsh) and/or a builtin
>>
2009-12-12, 10:21(+00), Stephane CHAZELAS:
[...]
>> exists()
>> {
>> [ -e "$1" -o -L "$1" ]
>> }
>
> $ exists =
> bash: [: too many arguments
>
> [ -e "$1" ] -o [ -L "$1" ]
[...]
Sorry, I meant
[ -e "$1" ] || [ -L "$1" ]
--
Stéphane
2009-12-11, 16:16(+00), Marc Herbert:
> Sven Mascheck a écrit :
>> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> This has been discussed more than once in c.u.s; check the
>>> archives.
>>
>> and that's why we better discuss it here now?
>
> I think Chris' message was more like: "let's not discuss it at all a
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Bernd Eggink wrote:
> Am 12.12.2009 02:11, schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
> > konsolebox wrote:
> > > I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
> > > declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
> > > option in typeset or declare lik
Am 10.12.2009 10:40, schrieb konsolebox:
I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
option in typeset or declare like -g (same as zsh) and/or a builtin
function like global as similar to local.
I seco
Am 12.12.2009 02:11, schrieb Matthew Woehlke:
konsolebox wrote:
I hope the development team will also consider adding a way in bash to
declare global variables inside a function perhaps either with an
option in typeset or declare like -g (same as zsh) and/or a builtin
function like global as sim
"Matias A. Fonzo" writes:
> A solution to check the broken symlink is:
>
> [ -e "foo" -o -L "foo" -a ! -e "foo" ]
In which way is the last check not redundant?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now f
18 matches
Mail list logo
