Re: history --no-numbers-please

2009-08-06 Thread jidanni
> "CR" == Chet Ramey writes: >> $ history needs a --no-numbers-please option (-u maybe?), as I can't >> recall when I didn't run the output through sed to get rid of them. CR> Why not just use fc -ln? Because "help history" didn't tip me off that I could try that. However $ history|wc -l 999

Re: history --no-numbers-please

2009-08-06 Thread Chet Ramey
> $ history needs a --no-numbers-please option (-u maybe?), as I can't > recall when I didn't run the output through sed to get rid of them. Why not just use fc -ln? -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRUc...@case.eduhttp://tiswww.tis.case.e

history --no-numbers-please

2009-08-06 Thread jidanni
$ history needs a --no-numbers-please option (-u maybe?), as I can't recall when I didn't run the output through sed to get rid of them.

Re: Bash does not read up the whole script which it is currently executing

2009-08-06 Thread Marc Herbert
Ivan Zahariev a écrit : > Same here, as Marc said. > > I think that usually we are reading the script from a file and this is > the use-case we must focus on. Currently, we have the problem I > described when executing a script from a file and I think this must be > fixed/changed. Hey, wait.

Re: Bash does not read up the whole script which it is currently executing

2009-08-06 Thread Ivan Zahariev
On Aug 5, 2:05 pm, Marc Herbert wrote: > I am not sure I get this... first of all, the script itself is usually > not read from stdin (but from fd 255 in bash). > > Now considering the seldom cases where the script is actually read from > stdin, are you saying that: it is a wanted feature that s