Jan Hnatek wrote:
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> So what does the Solaris mbrtowc return in this case? The flow of that
>> particular section of code isn't that great (bash-4.0 is better), but it
>> seems to me that point can only increase. If mbrtowc returns -2, the
>> loop won't be entered at all.
>
Christian Krause wrote:
> Given all of these facts I still tend to say that the bash shouldn't
> filter them...
There's always the following argument:
"Other characters may be permitted by an implementation; applications
shall tolerate the presence of such names."
I agree with Christian here. A
2009-06-26, 13:58(+02), Christian Krause:
> Hi Chet,
>
> Thanks for the answers. The problem is now, that this behavior of the
> bash creates some real problems outside, probably with a larger impact.
> Before asking the kernel developers to change parts of linux kernel's
> build system, I'd like t
