Jay wrote:
>
> Is this correct?
Pretty much, yes.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRUc...@case.eduhttp://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: i486
> OS: linux-gnu
> Compiler: gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i486'
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i486-pc-linux-gnu'
> -DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALE
Bob Proulx wrote:
> I respectfully disagree. Strongly! :-) PATH is a configuration of
> the caller's environment. It isn't a good idea to change it just to
> override the caller's desired environment.
Sorry. Virtually every reference on secure shell programming would
disagree with you.
Chet