With bash version: 4.0.10, the following case statement crashed with
segfault:
$ cat foo.sh
case a in
a) echo a ;&
esac
$ bash4 foo.sh
a
Segmentation fault
$
In an interactive shell, that case statement causes current shell to hang
with nearly 100% CPU usage.
The following patch fixes this f
Cameron Pulsford wrote:
> I am running bash 4.0.10 (installed through macports)
> hw = Macbook 2,1 os = mac os x 10.5.6
> Compiled with gcc 4.0.1
>
> A lot of times after a long vim session when I return to bash, my cursor
> is not on a new line, it's on a previous line and it seems like bash is
>
esum...@ualberta.ca wrote:
> Machine Type: amd64-portbld-freebsd7.1
>
> Bash Version: 4.0
> Patch Level: 10
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> Bash reports syntax error near unexpected token `)' for
> new-style command substitution syntax, i.e., $(command)
> in interactive an
lehe wrote:
1. The change to PATH is effective only in the current shell session. I was
wondering if it is possible to run the new bash instead of the old one
everytime it is lauched in terminal, putty and in emacs. Is there a place
where the change to PATH could be added and executed before bash
Chet Ramey wrote:
Sven Mascheck wrote:
I'd expect real daemons to detach from the terminal and create
a new session / new process group. Or is it, that just too
few actually do?
Let's just say the situation is much better than it was in the past.
Sven: I should point out that a more practic
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:40:58AM -0400, Dave Rutherford wrote:
> --- building
> $ gcc -fPIC -c -Wall sticky.c -o sticky.o
> $ gcc -shared sticky.o -ldl -lstdc++ -o sticky.so
> --- running
> $ export LD_PRELOAD=$PWD/sticky.so:$LD_PRELOAD
> --- for long-term use, add to bash startup files
>
> How
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> This still doesn't address the original poster's concerns if, for
> example, a web browser creates a new ~/.browserconf directory the first
> time it's invoked. But nothing bash can do will solve that.
True, but what about a wrapper?
--- s
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:40:58PM -0700, Ian Kelling wrote:
> mkdir also has the -m argument, so you could do
> mkdir -m 1755 dir
Ah, clever. Then:
mkdir() {
command mkdir -m $(printf '%o\n' $((01777 - $(umask "$@"
}
This still doesn't address the original poster's concerns if, for
examp
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
> #!/usr/bin/env bash
>
> if $(which gpg2); then
>printf "gpg2 located"
> fi
The behavior of which(1) is not reliable across platforms. Since you're
already using bash, you should consider using one of the bash builtins
instead:
if c
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> I wonder if I should modify it so the implicit 2>&1 happens first, right
> after the pipe, so any user-specified redirections can override it. That
> doesn't seem that radical a change. Opinions? (I know what you think,
> Andreas ;-) ).
If
10 matches
Mail list logo
