On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:38:10 Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> I would like to propose a new command for bash:
>
> ca [path]
>
> It returns the canonical path based on the current working directory and
> entered path.
>
>
> If the current working directory has been traversed through a symbolic
> li
I would like to propose a new command for bash:
ca [path]
It returns the canonical path based on the current working directory and
entered path.
If the current working directory has been traversed through a symbolic
link, then listing a higher level path using dotdot's do not always show
I
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Jon Seymour wrote:
>> Not sure this is correct. The ] is parsed by the shell
>
> It's parsed by the [ command. That happens to be a builtin command,
> so yes, it is done by the shell, but it is not part of the grammar of
> the shell language.
>
Jon Seymour wrote:
> Not sure this is correct. The ] is parsed by the shell
It's parsed by the [ command. That happens to be a builtin command,
so yes, it is done by the shell, but it is not part of the grammar of
the shell language.
> This is why the -n option reports an error, since -n suppre
Not sure this is correct. The ] is parsed by the shell but only if it
surrounded by whitespace. This is why the -n option reports an error,
since -n suppresses command execution.
I suspect the behaviour is required by posix or at least historical
precedent.
jon.
On 12/02/2009, at 7:04, p
Ronny Standtke wrote:
> The "-n" option not seem to work. Example with a little stupid nonsense
> script:
> ---
> ro...@ronny-desktop:/tmp$ cat test.sh
> #!/bin/sh
> if [ $blah == "test"]
This sort of error can't be caught by -n, because it's part of a
specific command, not the shell gram
Hi
The "-n" option not seem to work. Example with a little stupid nonsense
script:
---
ro...@ronny-desktop:/tmp$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/sh
if [ $blah == "test"]
then
echo "teste mich!"
fi
ro...@ronny-desktop:/tmp$ sh -n test.sh
ro...@ronny-desktop:/tmp$ sh test.sh
[: 5: missing ]
ro...
unscribe mailing list
--
--
http://purewell.biz
Ulrich Drepper in comment 6 to redhat bug 483385 links to
austin-group-l, item 11863 by Geoff Clare:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483385#c6
https://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_mail.tpl?CALLER=index.tpl&source=L&listname=austin-group-l&id=11863
Geoff Clare writes: [...]
I thi
On 2009-02-10, Chet Ramey wrote:
> I'm not immediately sure where you got that, but the documentation makes
> it clear:
>
> -e Exit immediately if a simple command (see SHELL GRAMMAR
> above) exits with a non-zero status. The shell does not
> exit
10 matches
Mail list logo
