Re: Build Problem

2009-02-02 Thread Chet Ramey
> I'm trying to build Bash 3.1 on Wndows XP system using MSYS. I'm getting a > build failure at make as follows: Sorry, I don't really support Windows. I generally steer folks to cygwin if they want to run bash on Windows. I think the mingw32 folks have bash patches available, too. Chet -- ``

Build Problem

2009-02-02 Thread Rupinder Singh
Hello, I'm trying to build Bash 3.1 on Wndows XP system using MSYS. I'm getting a build failure at make as follows: *** *** * * * GNU bash, version 3.1.0(

Re: Bash-4.0-rc1 available for FTP

2009-02-02 Thread Nicolas
bash_completion is too slow because it does strange things: it parses itself because it wants to emulate the behavior of "-o plusdirs". See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479936 for a preliminary patch. Thanks for pointing this out. This would indeed be a significant improvement!

Re: bash 3.2 and bash 4.0 (RC1) fail to build statically

2009-02-02 Thread Chet Ramey
Alex Howells wrote: > 2009/2/2 Chet Ramey : >> I was able to successfully compile and link after configuring >> --enable-static-link --without-bash-malloc (there's some problem with libc >> and the bash malloc when you try a static link). > > Yep that works for me too on anything except Debian GNU

Re: Bash-4.0-rc1 available for FTP

2009-02-02 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Nicolas writes: > Hello, > > I ran some benchmarks of Bash 4.0-rc1. It is quite impressive! Here are the > results. > My computer is a Pentium M (running at 600 MHz for the test), running Linux > 2.6.26 with libc6 version 2.7 and Debian bash-completion version 20080705. > The figur

Re: bash 3.2 and bash 4.0 (RC1) fail to build statically

2009-02-02 Thread Alex Howells
2009/2/2 Chet Ramey : > I was able to successfully compile and link after configuring > --enable-static-link --without-bash-malloc (there's some problem with libc > and the bash malloc when you try a static link). Yep that works for me too on anything except Debian GNU/Linux. On that I get failure

Re: bash 3.2 and bash 4.0 (RC1) fail to build statically

2009-02-02 Thread Chet Ramey
a...@howells.me wrote: > Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: > Machine: i486 > OS: linux-gnu > Compiler: gcc > > Description: > http://pastebin.com/f476b80da > configured via: http://pastebin.com/m62b92718 > > Adding --enable-minimal doesn't fix t

Re: bash, no slash

2009-02-02 Thread davide . chiarini
Hi Chet > I'm almost positive that you've remapped / to another character (or a > command that has no discernible effect) in readline.  Look at your > readline startup files.  You can see your current key bindings with > `bind -p' from the bash prompt. thanks, I was finally able to find the proble